S.R.WAGHMARE
SAVITABAI, CHANDRABHAN – Appellant
Versus
CHANDRABHAN DUBEY – Respondent
( 2 ) BRIEF facts of the case are that petitioner Smt. Savita Bai was married to the respondent Chandrabhan Dubey on 22-4-1996 according to Hindu custom and gave birth to the child, a son on 21-11-1996 after a period of only seven months and doubting the paternity of the child, the respondent chandrabhan Dubey filed suit for divorce under Section 12 of the Hindu Marriage Act stating that Savita Bai was pregnant prior to the marriage and he does not wish to continue with the said alliance.
( 3 ) THE petitioner Smt. Savita Bai filed her written statement. Shri Chandrabhan dubey had earlier filed an application requesting the same that the son should undergo the D. N. A. Test, which was rejected by the Trial Court by order dated 17-3-2001.
( 4 ) THE written statement was filed by the petitioner. The evidence was led by both the parties and when the matter was fixed for final arguments, the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.