SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(MP) 221

S.SAMVATSAR
DINESH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
KAUSHAL CHAND JAIN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
H.D.Gupta, N.K.Gupta, R.D.Jain, Shradha Dubey

( 1 ) THIS appeal is filed by the defendant challenging the judgment and decree dated 3/8/1998 passed by the Second Additional District Judge, Shivpuri in civil Suit No. 10-A of 1981 whereby the court has decreed the suit for declaration of possession and mesne profits.

( 2 ) THE brief facts of the case are that the plalntiff has filed the present suit alleging that the House No. 251 was owned by shankar Lal Cheetarmal, his name was recorded in the Municipal record since Samvat 2002. Pyarelal who was natural son of Nemichand was adopted by Shankar Lal somewhere in 1925 when he was 4-5 years of age. Nemichand had two other sons dhannalal and Pannalal. Pyarelal died in the year 1948-49, while Shankarlal died in the year 1951, at that time present plalntiff was minor. Sonibai wife of Pyarelal and chhutanki Bai wife of Shankarlal were looking after him, at that time Nemichand, who was residing in Rajasthan came to Shivpuri and started looking after the business as ammuktiyar. Nemichand was thus put in possession of the suit property by Sonibai and Chhutanki Bai to look after the business. At the time of filing of suit the plalntiff attained majority as he was 20 years of age as defenda
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top