SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(MP) 570

A.K.GOHIL, B.M.GUPTA
CHAND KHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Atul Gupta, M.P.S.Bhadoriya

ABHAY K. GOHIL, J.

( 1 ) VIDE Judgment dated 26. 8. 2002 passed by Additional sessions Judge, Sironj, District Vidisha, in sessions Trial No. 134/94 both the appellants have been convicted under sections 302/34 and 323/34 IPC, and sentenced to life imprisonment with fine of rs. 2000/- each and 6 months R. I. and fine of Rs. 1,000/- each, respectively. In this appeal both the appellants have assailed the judgment of the trial Court.

( 2 ) PROSECUTION story, as incorporated in the FIR, is that the residential house of Aziz Khan s/o Chhotekhan is near the house of Mohsin-acquitted accused. It was alleged in the report that on 7. 11. 92 at about 7. 30 p. m. Aziz Khan was standing in front of his house. At that time, Chandkhan s/o Bannekhan armed with farsa, Mohsil armed with farsa, yusufkhan (tried by Juvenile Court)armed with lathi and Naseem armed with lathi came there and shouted that kadma would not be spared. Apprehending that a quarrel may not take place with jalal, the witness went behind the house of Chandu Tailor and noticed that 4 accused persons surrounded Jalal and chandkhan s/o Bannekhan inflicted farsa blow to the deceased hitting him on the side of upper ear. Mohsin is a











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top