SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(MP) 560

S.K.SETH
PRABHU LAL – Appellant
Versus
BABULAL – Respondent


S. K. SETH, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal by claimant arises out of the award dated 28. 11. 2005 passed by the Second Motor Accidents claims Tribunal, Indore in the M. V. Case no. 162 of 2003. By the impugned award, claim for compensation preferred by the appellant under section 163-A of Motor vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act' for short) was rejected.

( 2 ) BRIEFLY stated, relevant facts found by the Tribunal are as under: appellant claimed that he was employed as driver with respondent No. 1, owner of truck bearing registration No. MP 09-D 1041. On 30. 9. 2003 appellant was bringing the loaded truck to Indore and he was waylaid and assaulted by unknown armed miscreants. Miscreants not only robbed rs. 1,500 but also caused injuries to the appellant, consequently the appellant is unable to work as driver any longer. The appellant, therefore, lodged a claim under section 163-A of the Act for compensation against respondents jointly and severally, they being owner and insurer of the truck on the fateful day.

( 3 ) CLAIM was contested by the insurance company, respondent No. 2, denying all material allegations including employment, accident and injuries. It also denied th






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top