SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(MP) 520

S.C.VYAS
GOVERDHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Bhagwan Singh, Sumanlata

( 1 ) THIS appeal under section 378 of Cr. P. C. has been preferred against the judgment of conviction passed by IIIrd Additional Sessions Judge Ratlam in S. T. No. 213/1992 dated 24/7/1993 holding appellant guilty for the offence punishable under Section 376 of IPC and sentencing him with rigorous imprisonment for 7 years and fine of Rs. 5,000/- with a direction to undergo three months' additional rigorous imprisonment in default of payment of fine.

( 2 ) THE case of the prosecution before Trial court in short was that on 17/5/2002 at about 1. 00 pm when prosecutrix PW-1 was alone in her residence, then appellant-accused goverdhan came there and enquired about her husband. Prosecutrix informed him that her husband has gone out and will be coming back by evening. Thereafter appellant while talking to the prosecutrix entered inside her house wielded a knife from his pocket and threatened complainant-prosecutrix and thereafter committed forcibly sexual intercourse with her, after completing the act he gave one rupee note to the prosecutrix and asked her not to tell anybody about this incident and thereafter left the place. The incident was narrated by the prosecutrix to her husband n





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top