2006 Supreme(MP) 928
High Court Of Madhya Pradesh
S. L. KOCHAR AND W. A. SHAH, JJ.
VINOD LAXMLPRASAD RAL - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH - Respondents
Cri. Appeal 772 Of 2003
Decided On : 08/07/2006
GIRISH DESAI, Sonali Gupta
The judgment emphasizes the importance of circumstantial evidence and the requirement for evidence to be substantive and properly documented, especially in cases relying on circumstantial evidence.
Headnote:
Criminal Law - Murder - Sections 450, 394/397, 302, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code - The judgment discusses the circumstantial evidence, including the discovery of the dead bodies and the appellant's relationship with the deceased, to establish guilt. The court found the appellant guilty of the murder of the child Meenu and confirmed the conviction and sentences for the offenses under Sections 450 and 201/34 of the Penal Code. However, the court reversed the conviction for the murder of Harivallabh and the offense under Section 394/397 Penal Code.
Fact of the Case:
The appellant was tried for offenses under Sections 450, 394/397, 302, and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of Harivallabh and Meenu. The prosecution relied on circumstantial evidence, including the discovery of the dead bodies and the appellant's relationship with the deceased. The trial court convicted the appellant for the murder of Harivallabh and Meenu, while acquitting the co-accused Sandeep.
Finding of the Court:
The court found the appellant guilty of the murder of Meenu based on the discovery of the dead body at his instance. However, the court found the evidence regarding the murder of Harivallabh and the offense under Section 394/397 Penal Code to be insufficient and reversed the conviction for these offenses.
Issues: The main issue was the appellant's involvement in the murders of Harivallabh and Meenu, based on circumstantial evidence and the discovery of the dead bodies.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the evidence regarding the murder of Harivallabh and the offense under Section 394/397 Penal Code was insufficient, leading to the reversal of the conviction for these offenses. However, the court confirmed the appellant's guilt for the murder of Meenu based on the discovery of the dead body at his instance.
Final Decision: The court partly allowed the appeal, reversing the conviction for the murder of Harivallabh and the offense under Section 394/397 Penal Code, while confirming the conviction and sentences for the offenses under Sections 450 and 201/34 of the Penal Code.
( 1 ) VINOD and Sandeep were tried together for offences punishable under Sections 450, 394/397, 302 and in the alternative 302/34 and 201/34 of the indian Penal Code, in the Court of learned fourth Additional Sessions Judge, Indore in sessions Trial No. /2002 and therein vide judgment dated 8-7-2003 Sandeep has been acquitted while Vinod has been convicted and sentenced as under :-
(a) Under Section 450 Penal Code, to RI for 10 years. (b) Under Section 394/397 Penal Code, to Life Imprisonment. (c) Under Section 302/34 Penal Code, to life Imprisonment with fine of Rs. 1,000-00 relating to murder of Harivallabh and also under Section 302/34 Penal Code, to Life imprisonment and fine of Rs. 1,000-00 relating to murder of Meenu, a 2 years female child. (d) Under Section 201/34 Penal Code, to ri for 7 years. All the sentences have been ordered to run concurrently and for each default of payment of fine, separate sentence of 10 months RI has been directed.
( 2 ) ACCUSED appellant Vinod being aggrieved has filed this appeal against the above judgment, findings and sentences. According to the prosecution, at the relevant time PW-1 Complainant Smt. Suman was working as a Sales Girl in Indira Export situated at Yeshwant Niwas Road, near Rani Sati gate, Indore. She and her husband harivallabh were blessed with a son aged 4 years named Shanu and daughter aged 2 years named Meenu. Her husband harivallabh was not having any regular employment and was only looking after petty works, therefore, when Shanu, who was studying in Merit School, remained away to school and complainant Smt. Suman away to her work, he used to stay back at home at Bhamori, Indore and looked after the 2 year old daughter Meenu. It was also an understanding created by Smt. Suman with her neighbour that after the return of Shanu from his School, he was being taken care of at the neighbour's residence till the arrival of Smt. Suman. On the fateful day i. e. 9-11-2001 around 9. 00 a. m. as usual Smt. Suman went to her work, Shanu had already gone to School, therefore, she left her husband Harivallabh and daughter Meenu at home. When she came back to her home around 7. 30 p. m. and taking Shanu from the neighbour's home reached there, opened the lock of the Boundary Gate and entered in her house. She found that one of the doors of her first room was closed from inside and another gate was closed from out side with chain being applied. She entered through the same gate into the room. As she reached there, she found her husband Harivallabh lying in a pool of blood on the floor. The complainant, therefore, called for help. Neighbour Mantu along with his mother reached there hearing her. They all found that Meenu was also missing and harivallabh @ Ballu was dead. Search for meenu was made but in vain. The complainant Smt. Suman through the help of a passer boy informed to the police about the incident. On the said information Sub-Inspector vinod Dixit reached the house of the complainant and took a Dehati Nalish Ex. P/l there.
( 3 ) STATION House Officer M. I. G. Police station, Indore - B. P. S. Parihar [p. W.-17] was informed telephonically about the incident. He, therefore, reached there and on the basis of Dehati Nalish, at the instance of the complainant, prepared spot map [ex. P/29] at 8. 40 p. m. Then on the basis of dehati Nalish, at Out Post Vijay Nagar, report Ex. P/22 was also written. On the basis of Ex. P/22, later at Police Station M. I. G. formal First Information Report [ex. P/l4] was prepared and the Crime No. 954/2001 was registered at 8. 50 p. m.
( 4 ) INVESTIGATION Officer B. P. S. Parihar [pw-17] on the date of the incident at 8. 50 p. m. collected samples of the blood sprinkled all over the floor and also took into his possession blood stained clothes which were used for clearing the floor, as also in the bathroom he found 3 knives placed near the wash-basin. Also took them into his possession. Out of the 3 knives, one of the knife was broken