SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(MP) 1262

DIPAK MISRA
SHAYAM SUNDER TRIPATHI – Appellant
Versus
LIFE INSURANCE corporation OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Atul Nema, D.K.DIXIT

( 1 ) THE petitioner was an agent of the Life Insurance Corporation of India (hereinafter referred to as the "lic") since 1987. During his functioning as an agent, he had received many a reward for his excellent performance in March, 1998, he got insured one Harish Chandra Gupta who unfortunately died in June, 1999. Because, of this situation, he was, as set forth, served with a show-cause notice by the authority of the Corporation why he had not informed the Corporation that the assured was suffering from diabetes for the last 15 years and stones in the kidney. The petitioner offered his explanation but the same was not accepted and his agency was terminated by order dated 3-2-2001. Against the aforesaid order of termination of agency, the petitioner preferred an appeal before the appellate authority who rejected the same as per order dated 8-11 2002 which has led him to prefer this writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India for issuance. of a writ of certiorari for quashment of the aforesaid orders as contained in Annexures-P-4 and P-6 respectively and to command the respondents to make payment of his commission to which he is entitled under law.

( 2 )




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top