SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(MP) 266

B.M.GUPTA
RAMAVATAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Brijesh Sharma, M.S.RAVAT, Rajesh Shukla, V.K.Saxena

B. M. GUPTA, J.

( 1 ) BOTH the petitions are arising out of one common order, hence both have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.

( 2 ) THE facts in brief are, that one Madhav singh lodged a report immediately after two hours of the incident at P. S. Dehat on 7th september, 2005 alleging against total eight person including the present petitioners, that by firing guns, they committed murders of Baijnath Singh, Shambhu Singh and shyam Singh and caused injuries to Banti singh and Bhupendra Singh. This report was registered at crime no. 438/05 for the offence punishable under Sections 302 and 307/34 of IPC. After investigation, charge- sheet was filed only against accused Kornal singh and Indrajeet Singh and about rest of the six named accused, it was mentioned that the case is not proved against them.

( 3 ) AFTER committal of the case, the Session Trial No. 265/05 is pending. During trial, after recording of the statements of eight witnesses ineluding the examination of Chief of Madhav Singh, one application was filed by complainant Madhav Singh under Section 319 of Cr. P. C. praying therein to take cognizance against rest of the six accused persons, w


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top