B.M.GUPTA
RAMAVATAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M. P. – Respondent
( 1 ) BOTH the petitions are arising out of one common order, hence both have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.
( 2 ) THE facts in brief are, that one Madhav singh lodged a report immediately after two hours of the incident at P. S. Dehat on 7th september, 2005 alleging against total eight person including the present petitioners, that by firing guns, they committed murders of Baijnath Singh, Shambhu Singh and shyam Singh and caused injuries to Banti singh and Bhupendra Singh. This report was registered at crime no. 438/05 for the offence punishable under Sections 302 and 307/34 of IPC. After investigation, charge- sheet was filed only against accused Kornal singh and Indrajeet Singh and about rest of the six named accused, it was mentioned that the case is not proved against them.
( 3 ) AFTER committal of the case, the Session Trial No. 265/05 is pending. During trial, after recording of the statements of eight witnesses ineluding the examination of Chief of Madhav Singh, one application was filed by complainant Madhav Singh under Section 319 of Cr. P. C. praying therein to take cognizance against rest of the six accused persons, w
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.