( 1 ) IN invocation of the extraordinary Jurisdiction of this Court under Art. 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioners have called in question the penetrability of the order passed in Civil Suit No. 27-A/04 by the learned Civil Judge-II, Jabalpur whereby he has rejected the application preferred under section 65 of the Evidence Act by the petitioners,

( 2 ) THE facts in a nutshell are that the respondents Initiated a civil action seeking ejectment of the petitioners from the suit house on the grounds arrears of rent, subletting and bona fide need for non-residential purpose under Section 12 (a) (b) of the m. P. Accommodation Control Act. It is the case of the respondents before the Court below that they are the landlord of building no. 662 situated at Kotwali ward Jabalpur and the petitioner No. 1 is the tenant of the building as per agreement dated 16-3-1976 executed between the respondent No. 1 and the petitioner No. 1. The accommodation that was let out was one room and basement and was rented for Rs. 100/- per month. As putforth, the petitioner failed to pay rent despite so many demands hence, the claim was filed from 1-7-2001 till the date of filing of the suit at the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document