SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(MP) 773

A.K.GOHIL, SHEELA KHANNA
UDAYVEER – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
C.S.Dixit, M.S.RAVAT, V.K.Saxena

ABHAY GOHIL, J.

( 1 ) THIS judgment shall also govern the disposal of Criminal Appeal No. 169/02.

( 2 ) CRIMINAL Appeal. No. 325/02 has been filed by appellant Udayveer from jail and appellant Radheshyam has filed Criminal appeal No. 169/2002 under Section 374 cr. P. C. against the common judgment dated 5. 4. 2002, In Sessions Trial No. 128/1999 appellant Udayveer Singh was tried before the Sessions Judge Bhind under Section 302 and 307/34 IPC and under Section 27 (1) of arms Act and appellant Radheshyam was tried under Section 302/34 and 307 IPC and section 27 (1) and 29 (B) of Arms Act. Appellant Udayveer has been convicted and sentenced under Section 302 IPC for life imprisonment and fine of Rs. 5,000 in default of payment of fine three years RI and under Section 27 (1) of Arms Act for two years ri and fine of Rs. 2,000 in default of payment of fine six months further RI. Appellant Radheshyam has been convicted and sentenced under Section 302/34 IPC for life imprisonment and fine of Rs. 5,000 and in default of payment of fine two years RI and under Section 27 (1) of Arms Act for three years RI and fine of Rs. 2,000 and in default of payment of fine six months further ri and unde



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top