SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(MP) 160

S.P.KHARE
ASHISH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
LEELA BAI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
MOHD.ALI, SUNIL MISHRA

S. P. KHARE, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a revision by the applicants against the order by which their appeal under S. 384 of the Indian Succession Act challenging the order refusing to grant a succession certificate in their favour on their application under S. 372 of the Act, has been dismissed.

( 2 ) IT is not in dispute that deceased Shakuntalabai was a teacher in Primary School, Chandana and she died on 7-6-1998. Non-applicant Smt. Leela Bai was her mother. Shakuntalabai declared name of her mother Smt. Leela Bai in the Government records as her nominee.

( 3 ) APPLICANT No. 2nathuram claims to be the husband and applicant No. 1 Ashinsh Kumar, aged 7 years, claims to be son of Shakuntalabai. They submitted an application under S. 372 of the Indian succession Act for grant of a succession certificate in their favour. Non-applicant No. 1 Smt. Leela bai, mother of Shakuntala bai, opposed this application. According to her, the applicants are not in any way related to Shakuntalabai as she died unmarried. The court of civil Judge, Cl. I. Balaghat after appreciation of the evidence adduced by both the parties held that applicant No. 2 Nathuram is not the husband of Shakuntalabai. It was found th







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top