High Court Of Madhya Pradesh
S. B. SAKRIKAR
BIJERAM - Appellant
Versus
MANGUDAS - Respondents
M. A. 15 Of 1998
Decided On : 04/30/2002
Motor Vehicles Act - Insurance Policy Commencement - Liability Exoneration
Fact of the Case:
The claimant filed for compensation against the appellant, the driver, and the insurance company for an alleged accident. The tribunal awarded compensation to the claimant, exonerating the insurance company from liability based on the commencement time of the insurance policy.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the insurance policy's effective commencement time was after the alleged accident, thus exonerating the insurance company from liability.
Issues: Dispute over the liability of the insurance company for compensation due to an alleged accident and the interpretation of the commencement time of the insurance policy.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the provision of the Insurance Act and the interpretation of the commencement time of the insurance policy as mentioned in the policy document. It also considered the Supreme Court's decision that the insurance policy becomes effective for liability from the mentioned commencement time.
Final Decision: The appeal filed by the appellant was dismissed, and the court upheld the tribunal's decision to exonerate the insurance company from liability.
( 1 ) THE appellant, owner of the offending vehicle, has directed this appeal under section 173 of Motor Vehicles act, against the award dated 1. 9. 1997 passed by M. A. C. T. , Mandsaur in M. A. C. C. Case No. 33 of 1997 thereby exonerating the respondent No. 3 insurance company from the liability of payment of compensation as awarded in favour of respondent no. 1 (claimant ).
( 2 ) FOR the purpose of disposal of this appeal, facts in brief are, that a case for grant of compensation was filed before the tribunal by the claimant-respondent No. 1 against the present appellant who was indicated as owner of the offending vehicle; respondent No. 2 driving the vehicle at the time of alleged accident and the respondent No. 3, the insurance company with whom the alleged tractor was insured.
( 3 ) IT is not in dispute that the alleged accident occurred at 4 p. m. on 2. 12. 1992, the learned Tribunal allowed the petition filed on behalf of the claimant and awarded compensation of Rs. 72,000 together with the interest at the rate of 12 per cent per annum in favour of the claimant payable by appellant and respondent no, 2. The insurance company was exonerated from the liability of payment of awarded amount mainly on the ground that as per case of the insurance company the time of commencing of policy was mentioned in the policy and according to the insurance policy, it commenced from 5. 30 p. m. on 2. 12. 1992.
( 4 ) AGREEING by the aforesaid award of the Claims Tribunal exonerating insurance company from the liability of payment of awarded amount, the appellant owner has filed this appeal.
( 5 ) I have heard Mr. Vinay Vijaywargiya, learned counsel appearing for the appellant and Mr. S. V. Dandwate, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 3 insurance company. No one appears for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
( 6 ) THE only contention of the learned counsel for the appellant is that as per case of the appellant he submitted the proposal form along with amount of the premium to the agent of the insurance company at 11 a. m. on 2. 12. 1992. As such, the policy commences from the time of handing over the proposal form and premium to the agent of the insurance company, in view of the provision of section 64-VB of the insurance Act. As against this, the learned counsel for the respondent No. 3 Mr. S. V. Dandwate submitted that as per the provision of section 64-VB of the Insurance act, the policy may commence from the time and date when the proposal along with premium was handed over to the agent of the insurance company, but under the same provision, it is mentioned that the risk under the policy shall commence from the time of acceptance of the proposal and issuance of the cover note. He also contended that in view of series of decisions of the Supreme Court, the risk under the insurance policy shall come into force from the time and date mentioned in the cover note or in the policy, as the case may be and in no case prior to that. Reliance is placed on the decision of the Apex Court in case of New India Assurance- Co. Ltd. v. Bhagwati Devi, 1999 ACJ 534 (SC ).
( 7 ) I have considered the submissions of the learned counsel forthe parties and perused the record. In this case, insurance policy is available on the record and on perusal of the insurance policy (Exh. D-4), it emerged that in this policy the effective date and time of the insurance is mentioned as 5. 30 p. m. on 2. 12. 1992 to 1. 12. 1993. In view of the decision of the Apex Court, when the time of commencement is mentioned in the insurance policy it shall become effective for the liability of payment of compensation from the time onwards, as mentioned in the insurance policy. In this case, it is not disputed that the alleged accident occurred much prior to the time of commencement of the insurance policy (Exh. D-4 ). As such, in my considered opinion, the learned Claims Tribunal has committed no error in exonerating the insurance company from the liability of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.