SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(MP) 503

S.B.SAKRIKAR
BIJERAM – Appellant
Versus
MANGUDAS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.V.DANDVATE, VINAY VIJAYVARGIYA

SAKRIKAR, J.

( 1 ) THE appellant, owner of the offending vehicle, has directed this appeal under section 173 of Motor Vehicles act, against the award dated 1. 9. 1997 passed by M. A. C. T. , Mandsaur in M. A. C. C. Case No. 33 of 1997 thereby exonerating the respondent No. 3 insurance company from the liability of payment of compensation as awarded in favour of respondent no. 1 (claimant ).

( 2 ) FOR the purpose of disposal of this appeal, facts in brief are, that a case for grant of compensation was filed before the tribunal by the claimant-respondent No. 1 against the present appellant who was indicated as owner of the offending vehicle; respondent No. 2 driving the vehicle at the time of alleged accident and the respondent No. 3, the insurance company with whom the alleged tractor was insured.

( 3 ) IT is not in dispute that the alleged accident occurred at 4 p. m. on 2. 12. 1992, the learned Tribunal allowed the petition filed on behalf of the claimant and awarded compensation of Rs. 72,000 together with the interest at the rate of 12 per cent per annum in favour of the claimant payable by appellant and respondent no, 2. The insurance company was exonerated from the liability o








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top