CHANDRESH BHUSHAN, R.B.DIXIT
PURSHOTTAM – Appellant
Versus
BHAGWAT SHARAN – Respondent
( 1 ) JUDGMENT in this appeal shall also govern the disposal of First Appeal No. 155 of 1995 (Kanhaiyalal and seven others v. Bhagwat Sharan and 21 others) as both these appeals arise out of the same judgment and have been preferred by different sets of defendants in the original suit.
( 2 ) THIS is a first appeal by the appellants against judgment dated 1-8-1995 pronounced by District Judge, Guna, whereby a decree for partition of certain immoveable property consisting of six houses and some agricultural lands was passed in favour of the respondent No. 1, who was the plaintiff in the suit.
( 3 ) IT is not disputed that the appellants and the respondents No. 1 to 14 had a common ancestor viz. , Mangatrao, who lived in Narnaul at Rajasthan. He had four sons viz. , (1) Madho Prasad, (2) Lalchand, (3) Ramchand and (4) Umraolal. Madho Prasad had no issue and, therefore, he adopted Hariram, who was the real son of his brother Lalchand. Similarly, Ramchand also had no issue and he also adopted another son of Lalchand viz. , Shriram, Ramchand himself had gone in adoption to one Gourimal of Gwalior. The appellants were the widow, sons and daughter of that Hariram, who
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.