SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(MP) 977

CHANDRESH BHUSHAN, R.B.DIXIT
PURSHOTTAM – Appellant
Versus
BHAGWAT SHARAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.M.Naik, B.K.AGARWAL, C.R.ROMAN, M.B.MANGAL, R.A.Roman, R.D.AGRAWAL, R.D.Jain

CHANDRESH BHUSHAN, J.

( 1 ) JUDGMENT in this appeal shall also govern the disposal of First Appeal No. 155 of 1995 (Kanhaiyalal and seven others v. Bhagwat Sharan and 21 others) as both these appeals arise out of the same judgment and have been preferred by different sets of defendants in the original suit.

( 2 ) THIS is a first appeal by the appellants against judgment dated 1-8-1995 pronounced by District Judge, Guna, whereby a decree for partition of certain immoveable property consisting of six houses and some agricultural lands was passed in favour of the respondent No. 1, who was the plaintiff in the suit.

( 3 ) IT is not disputed that the appellants and the respondents No. 1 to 14 had a common ancestor viz. , Mangatrao, who lived in Narnaul at Rajasthan. He had four sons viz. , (1) Madho Prasad, (2) Lalchand, (3) Ramchand and (4) Umraolal. Madho Prasad had no issue and, therefore, he adopted Hariram, who was the real son of his brother Lalchand. Similarly, Ramchand also had no issue and he also adopted another son of Lalchand viz. , Shriram, Ramchand himself had gone in adoption to one Gourimal of Gwalior. The appellants were the widow, sons and daughter of that Hariram, who



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top