SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(MP) 627

High Court Of Madhya Pradesh
ARUN MISHRA
M.P.STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, JABALPUR - Appellant
Versus
COLLECTOR, MANDLA - Respondents
W. P. 831 Of 2002
Decided On : 06/26/2002

Advocates Appeared:
V.AVASTHY, V.Rusia

The main legal point established in the judgment is that electricity can be considered a hazardous substance under the relevant acts based on its characteristics and properties, and notification by the Central Government is not necessary for it to be classified as such.

Headnote:

electricity - hazardous substance - Public Liability Insurance Act, 1991, Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 - Section 2 (d), Section 2 (e)

Fact of the Case:

The case involved a claim for compensation due to the death of an individual from electrocution. The main question was whether electricity could be considered a hazardous substance under the Public Liability Insurance Act, 1991 and the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that electricity is a hazardous substance based on its characteristics and properties, and it does not require notification by the Central Government to be considered as such. The court also emphasized the strict liability without fault in case of accidents involving hazardous substances.

Issues: The main issue was whether electricity could be classified as a hazardous substance under the relevant acts and whether notification by the Central Government was necessary for it to be considered as such.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the characteristics of electricity, its potential to cause harm, and the interpretation of the relevant legal provisions. The court emphasized that electricity's properties make it a hazardous substance, and notification by the Central Government is not necessary for it to be classified as such.

Final Decision: The writ petition was dismissed, and the court held that electricity is a hazardous substance, and the liability of the electricity board was established without the need for fault or negligence.

ARUN MISHRA, J.

( 1 ) IN the instant writ petition, the question arises whether 'electricity' can be treated as a "hazardous substance" as defined in Section 2 (d) of the Public Liability Insurance Act, 1991 (for short 'act of 1991') read with Section 2 (e) of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 (for short 'act of 1986' ).

( 2 ) CLAIMANT/respondent No. 2 Smt. Sukarti Bai filed an application before the Collector, District Mandla claiming compensation from petitioner M. P. Electricity Board, Jabalpur on account of the death of her husband Kashiram, as the death of her husband took place owing to electrocution while the deceased came in contact with the electric wire.

( 3 ) THE Collector has awarded a compensation of Rs. 25,000/- holding that the electricity is a hazardous substance as per Public Liability Insurance Act, 1991.

( 4 ) THE petitioner in the instant writ petition avers that M. P. Electricity Board is a body duly constituted under Section 5 of the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948. The Collector failed to appreciate the legal position properly. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the electricity is not a hazardous substance and the same does not come within the definition of a hazardous substance as defined in Section 2 (d) of the Act of 1991 which has referred to the words "hazardous substance" as defined in Environment (Protection) Act, 1986. The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the electricity is hazardous if it is not used with proper care and caution but it is not a substance. Electricity is nothing but simply the flow of free electrons in a particular time at a particular movement. This flow can be in a wire or in the atmosphere in general in lightening. The flow of energy cannot be held to be a substance. Therefore, the electricity cannot be termed as hazardous substance. It is further averred in the instant writ petition that the electricity has not been notified by the Central Government as hazardous substance under Section 2 (d) of the Public Liability Insurance Act, 1991. Notification issued on 24-3-1992 by the Central Government makes no mention of electricity as hazardous substance, hence in the absence of notification of electricity, it cannot come within the definition of hazardous substance as defined in Section 2 (d) of the Act of 1991. The other facts are not repeated as they are not related to the points in question.

( 5 ) LEARNED counsel appearing for the respondent No. 1 Collector, Mandla submitted that the impugned order does not call for any interference. Reliance is placed on the decision of this Court in Writ Petition No. 2165 of 2001 (M. P. State Electricity Board, Jabalpur v. Collector, Mandla and others) decided on 15-4-2002 by Brother Justice Dipak Misra in which the decision of Allahabad High Court in U. P. State Electricity Board v. District Magistrate, Dehradun AIR 1998 All 1, has been relied upon. Learned counsel for the respondent No. 1 further submitted that the electricity has to be treated as a hazardous substance.

( 6 ) "first question for consideration is whether electricity is a "hazardous substance"? before I advert to the two decisions cited at the Bar, it is relevant to notice that it has not been disputed that the electricity is hazardous. The electricity is as something seen only through the results accomplished by it (Hill v. Carolina Power and Light Co. , 28 SE 2d 545, 553, 204 SC 83) which has become essential part of life and intrinsically connected with reasonable enjoyment of right to life itself. Life is not as animal existence but encompasses in itself basic frugal comforts which are necessary to make life worth.

( 7 ) THE characteristics indicates that "electricity" is a silent, deadly and instantaneous force, Electricity is a subtle, invisible, noiseless, death-dealing agency that gives no warning of its presence. Those who make, sell, distribute and use electricity, which is invisible force highly dangerous to life and pro

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top