SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(MP) 885

S.SAMVATSAR
RAMHET – Appellant
Versus
AJAYPAL SINGH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.M.Mishra, S.K.JAIN

S. SAMVATSAR, J.

( 1 ) THIS second appeal is filed by the defendants challenging the judgment and decree dated 29-3-1994 passed by the Additional District Judge, Lahar, District Bhind in Civil Appeal No. 17a/93. By the said judgment and decree the learned Judge has affirmed the judgment and decree dated 30-10-1993 passed by the Civil Judge Class I, Lahar in Civil Appeal No. 250a/90.

( 2 ) THIS appeal is admitted by this Court on the following substantial questions of law:" (1) Whether the application under Order 9, Rule 7 C. P. C. was wrongly rejected by the trial Court holding that it was not maintainable? (2) Whether the suit abated as a whole in the absence of the legal representatives of the deceased defendants buche and Tijore?

( 3 ) THE brief facts of the case are that the respondents-plaintiff filed a suit for declaration of his title in respect of the agriculture land bearing survey No. 327 having an area of 0. 993 hectares. The said suit was filed on 1-5-1986. The notices of the suit wre returned 'as served', and since no one appeared, the defendants were proceeded ex-parte by order dated 9-3-1990. The case was then fixed for recording of ex-parte evidence on 8-5-1990 on th







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top