SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(MP) 33

S.P.KHARE
MST. SOMWATI TIWARI – Appellant
Versus
PEOPLE IN GENERAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
SANJAY KUMAR AGARWAL

S. P. KHARE, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a revision by the applicants against the order by which their appeal challenging the order of the rejection of their application under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (hereinafter to be referred to as the Act) has been dismissed.

( 2 ) BOTH the Courts below have taken the view that the Court in which the application under Section 372 of the Act was presented has no territorial jurisdiction to decide the application. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioners this Court is of the opinion that the view taken by the two Courts below is erroneous and contrary to the provision made in Section 371 of the Act. The case of the applicants was that Motilal Tiwari was working as Section Commander in 11th Battalion at Bhilai. He died in a hospital in Jabalpur. It is clearly mentioned in the letter dated 19-5-2000 (Ex. P-2) of the Commandant, 11th Battalion, Bhilai that Motilal Tiwari was permanent resident of village Marhi, District Satna and he was posted at Bhilai as Section Commander.

( 3 ) SECTION 371 of the Act provides that the District Judge within whose jurisdiction the deceased "ordinarily resided" at the time of his death may gra





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top