SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(MP) 14

S.L.KOCHAR
SURESH R. DAVE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.S.CHAUHAN, M.Upadhyaya, P.K.SHUKLA

S. L. KOCHAR, J.

( 1 ) THIS petition has been filed against the order dated 26-10-2002 passed by Addl. Sessions Judge, Mhow District Indore in Cr. Revn. No. 619/2002 arising out of the order dated 4-10-2002 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Mhow in Cr. Case No. 277/2002 whereby dismissing the application of the applicant filed under Ss. 451/457 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of Tata Sumo bearing Registration No. MP-09-S-5511 on interim custody of the applicant, he being a registered owner of the vehicle.

( 2 ) THE application of the applicant has been dismissed by both the Courts below on the ground that as per provisions under S. 47 (d) of the M. P. Excise Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) the Criminal Court has no jurisdiction to release the vehicle on interim custody because, the District Magistrate has already initiated the proceedings against the applicant for confiscation of the vehicle and other seized property as per provision under S. 47 of the Act.

( 3 ) THE contention of the learned counsel for the applicant is that uptill now as per provision under S. 47-D of the Act, the Criminal Court has not been intimated by the District







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top