ARUN MISHRA
MADHYA PRADESH ELECTRICITY BOARD, RAMPUR, JABALPUR – Appellant
Versus
BADRI PRASAD – Respondent
( 1 ) IN these writ petitions Madhya Pradesh Electricity Board (MPEB) is assailing the order P. 7 passed by the SDO Khandwa, East Nimar, on 25-5-99 and the order P. 8 passed by the Commissioner, Indore, Division Indore, on 6-12-2000 in appeal.
( 2 ) THE petitioner MPEB filed an application u/s. 5 of the M. P. Lok Parisar Bedakhali Adhiniyam, 1974 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Adhiniyam') for eviction of respondent No. 1 as unauthorised occupant. Respondent No. 2 filed an application for addition as necessary party claiming the title by virtue of adverse possession and for that it was stated that civil suit 7-A/98 is pending before the first Civil Judge Class II, Khandwa. The learned SDO has held that it was not having jurisdiction as the unauthorised occupant, respondent No. 1, in each of the petition was not let out the premises by virtue of employment in MPEB. The MPEB has not given the possession to respondent No. 1. As such the provisions of the Adhiniyam are not attracted and the application was dismissed. It was also found by the SDO that MPEB had purchased the property on 30/04/1955 from M/s. Jassrup Baijnath Bahety and Sons Pvt. Ltd.
( 3 ) BEING aggrieved
Govt. of Andhra Pradesh v. Thummala Krishna Rao
State of West Bengal v. Dalhousie Institute Society
Referred to : Union of India v. Rakesh Kumar
Accountant and Secretarial Services Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India
Mehrunnissa Begum v. Govt. of Andhra Pradesh
Nityanand M. Joshi v. Life Insurance Corporation of India
Gursharan Singh v. New Delhi Municipal Committee
Birla Cement Works v. G.M.Western Railways
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.