SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(MP) 488

UMA NATH SINGH, RAJENDRA MENON
TARABAI – Appellant
Versus
RAHUL TRADING AND FINANCE CO. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.P.AGRAWAL, N.D.SINGHAL, SANJAY DWIVEDI, V.G.Khot

SINGH AND MENON, J.

( 1 ) HEARD learned counsel for the parties and perused the records.

( 2 ) IN view of the legal principle of res ipsa loquitur and a latest judgment of the hon'ble Apex Court in Kaushnuma Begum v. New India Assurance Co. Ltd. , 2001 acj 428 (SC), once the vehicle in question was found to have dashed against a tree, no further evidence was required to prove the negligence. Accordingly, the Tribunal is directed to assess the compensation on the presumption that the vehicle was being driven rashly and negligently. Secondly, from para 19 of the award, it appears that some error has been committed in fixing liabilities of the parties. Hence, the Tribunal shall also examine the extent of liability of the insurance company and the private parties for payment of compensation.

( 3 ) WITH the aforesaid directions, the m. A. is remitted to the Tribunal for afresh consideration. The parties shall appear before the Tribunal on 24. 6. 2003. To ensure the appearance of the parties the Tribunal shall issue notice to them. Thus, the M. A. is hereby disposed of. Orders accordingly.


.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top