SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(MP) 468

S.S.KEMKAR, BHAWANI SINGH
PHOOL SINGH – Appellant
Versus
PANKHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Abhishek Arjaria, Amrit Ruprah, N.S.Rupesh, P.K.JAISWAL

BHAWANI SINGH, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is directed against the award of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Panna in Claim case No. 5 of 1994 dated 20. 3. 1997.

( 2 ) ACCIDENT took place on 3. 1. 1993. Tractor-trolley, owned by Phool Singh, driven by Ramlal, met with accident. According to the claimants it happened due to rash and negligent driving of tractor-trolley by the driver. Tractor-trolley was carrying agricultural produce belonging to the owner. It is alleged that trolley tilted and the deceased fell into a ditch and was hit by tyre of the trolley. He died instantaneously. Compensation of Rs. 13,64,000 is claimed since family was dependent on him being the sole bread-earner.

( 3 ) INSURANCE company alleges that the tractor-trolley was being used in violation of insurance policy since it was carrying passengers and goods of other persons. As per insurance policy it could not carry any passenger, therefore, insurance company is not liable to pay compensation. Other respondents said that the occupants of the trolley got into it despite refusal by owner and driver. It is admitted that it was full of grain items. Consequently, they are not liable for payment of compensation to the cl






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top