SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(MP) 437

AJIT SINGH
PHOOLMATI BAI – Appellant
Versus
MOHD. AZAD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Sharad Gupta, Surendra Gangele

AJIT SINGH, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal, by the claimants, is directed against the interim award dated 2. 12. 2002 passed in Claim case No. 63 of 2002 by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Katni, whereby only a sum of Rs. 25,000 has been awarded on the ground that by Repealing and amending Act, 2001, the Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Act, 1994 has been repealed and, therefore, the provisions of Motor vehicles Act, 1988 prior to amendment of 1994 are applicable.

( 2 ) THE claimants are wife and parents of the deceased Dayaram. On the intervening night of 4/5. 5. 2002 Dayaram was run over by a truck while he was sleeping by the side of road. He died on the spot. The said truck was being driven by the driver respondent No. 1. The truck is owned by the respondent No. 2 and insured with the respondent No. 3.

( 3 ) THE appellants filed a claim petition for compensation along with an application under section 140 of Motor Vehicles act, 1988 for grant of compensation of rs. 50,000 against the respondents on the principle of 'no fault liability'.

( 4 ) LEARNED Tribunal awarded a sum of rs. 25,000 only as interim compensation and rejected the claim for the remaining amount on the ground that by Repe





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top