SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(MP) 782

High Court Of Madhya Pradesh
DEEPAK VERMA, S. K. SETH
CHAMPABAI - Appellant
Versus
BAJPAI ROAD LINES - Respondents
M. A. 1338 Of 2001
Decided On : 07/15/2003

Advocates Appeared:
A.GOYAL, P.Mitha

Calculation of future loss of dependency based on the deceased's monthly income and application of a multiplier to determine enhanced compensation.

Headnote:

Compensation - Motor Accident Claims - Dependency - Sanskrit Scholar - Enhancement of Compensation

Fact of the Case:

The 7th Additional Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal awarded Rs. 70,000 to the widow of a deceased Sanskrit scholar. The widow and major sons appealed for enhancement of the compensation due to the deceased's death in a road accident.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the deceased's monthly income was Rs. 3,000 and applied a multiplier of 8 to calculate the future loss of dependency, resulting in an enhanced compensation of Rs. 2,20,000. The appeal was partly allowed, and the award of the Claims Tribunal was modified accordingly.

Issues: Dependency compensation for the deceased Sanskrit scholar and the appeal for enhancement of compensation.

Ratio Decidendi: The court determined the future loss of dependency based on the deceased's monthly income and applied a multiplier to calculate the enhanced compensation.

Final Decision: The appeal was partly allowed, and the enhanced compensation of Rs. 2,20,000 was awarded with an interest of 6 per cent from the date of application. Respondent No. 3 was ordered to bear the costs.

VERMA, SETH, JJ.

( 1 ) FOR the death of a sanskrit scholar aged about 59 years, 7th additional Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Indore in Claim Case No. 403 of 1996 has awarded Rs. 70,000 to his widow. The tribunal found that the other claimants who are major sons of the deceased were not dependent upon him and, therefore, were not entitled to receive any compensation.

( 2 ) THE widow along with major sons, have preferred this appeal for enhancement of the compensation.

( 3 ) IT is not disputed before us that deceased died on account of a road accident which took place on 31. 7. 1996 while he was travelling in a M. P. S. R. T. C. bus from dhamnod to Indore, a truck bearing the registration No. MP-K 7479 collided with the bus. The deceased was highly qualified person and he had B. Ed. and M. Phil. degrees. From the evidence it is clear that he used to teach Sanskrit to students. Thus, it can be safely held that monthly income of the deceased was Rs. 3,000.

( 4 ) THE loss of dependency of appellant no. 1 therefore, comes to Rs. 24,000 per annum. The Tribunal applied multiplier of 7 which according to us is on the lower side. In the facts and circumstances of the case proper multiplier is 8. Thus, the future loss of dependency of the appellant No. 1 comes to Rs. 1,92,000. To this we add another sum of Rs. 28,000. Thus the total compensation which the appellant No. 1 alone is entitled to receive from respondent nos. 1 and 3 jointly and severally comes to Rs. 2,20,000 (rupees two lakh twenty thousand ).

( 5 ) THUS, the appeal is partly allowed. The award of the Claims Tribunal stands modified to the extent indicated above. The enhanced amount shall carry interest of 6 per cent from the date of application till it is actually paid. Respondent No. 3 shall bear cost throughout. Counsel fee rs. 1,000, if certified.


.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top