SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(MP) 979

A.K.GOHIL
ANTARSINGH – Appellant
Versus
RAMPRAKASH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
DANDVATE, SUNIL JAIN

A. K. GOHIL, J.

( 1 ) APPELLANT-CLAIMANT has filed this appeal under section 173 of the motor Vehicles Act against the award dated 19. 4. 2001 passed by the Additional m. A. C. T. , Dhar in Claim Case No. 4 of 2001 dismissing the claim petition without considering the merits of the case on the ground that the M. A. C. T. , Dhar is not having jurisdiction to hear and decide petition filed by the claimant and further directing that if the claimant wants to take back the petition he may do so for its presentation before the competent court having jurisdiction in the matter.

( 2 ) THE following facts in this case are not in dispute for the disposal of this appeal that the accident in question occurred on 4. 5. 1999 at village Limkheda near Godhra in the State of Gujarat and the claimant/ the driver of the vehicle, resides at village sagwal, Tehsil Sardarpur, District Dhar and the vehicle which met with the accident was insured with respondent No. 2, united India Insurance Co. Ltd. having its branch office at Indore. Admittedly, in this case the policy was issued at Indore and that the claim petition was filed before the motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Dhar. The insurance company took









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top