S.K.PANDE
GOUS MOHD. – Appellant
Versus
MOHD. ANWAR – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS revision under Section 115 of CPC is directed against the order dt. 26-8-2000, passed by 12th ADJ. Jabalpur in MCA No. 59/98 affirming the order dt. 3-9-98, passed by 11th Civil Judge Class-II, jabalpur in MJC No. 77/97 whereby application under Order 22, Rule 10, CPC filed by the applicant has been dismissed.
( 2 ) PLAINTIFF/non-APPLICANTS-AWADH Bihari and Govind instituted C. S. No. 325-A/94 in the Court of Civil Judge seeking eviction of tenant-defendant/non-applicants Nos. 1 to 5 on grounds under Section 12 (l){a) (e) of the mp Accommodation Control Act (hereinafter referred to the "act" for convenience ). The suit was decreed ex parte vide judgment dt. 6-10-1994. Defendant/non-applicants Nos. 1 to 5 thereafter filed application under Order 9, Rule 13, CPC for setting aside the ex parte decree in C. S. No. 325-A/94. Plaintiff/non-applicants Awadh Bihari, Govind soni, vide Regd. Sale-deed dated 4-3-1996 sold the suit house to the applicant Gous mohd. and specifically assigned the decree passed by 10th Civil Judge Class-II in C. S. No. 325-A/94 in favour of applicant. Since the application under Order 9, Rule 13, CPC is pending, applicant filed applicati
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.