SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(MP) 161

High Court Of Madhya Pradesh
R. S. GARG
SANTOSH KUMAR - Appellant
Versus
SANJAY MORE - Respondents
Misc. Appeal 868 Of 1996
Decided On : 02/20/1998

Advocates Appeared:
P.K.Jain, R.P.Kanojiya, S.K.RAO

Destruction or permanent impairment of the powers of any member or joint would certainly provide a ground for making an award under Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act irrespective of the percentage of loss or the grievousness of the injury or the resultant effect.

Headnote:

{'KEYWORD': 'Motor Vehicles Act, 1988', 'SUBJECT': 'Permanent Disablement', 'ACT SECTION LIST': ['Section 140', 'Section 142'], 'SUMMARY': 'The court held that destruction or permanent impairment of the powers of any member or joint would certainly provide a ground for making an award under Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act irrespective of the percentage of loss or the grievousness of the injury or the resultant effect.'}

Fact of the Case:

The appellant filed an application under Section 142 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, claiming that fracture/extraction of tooth would be a permanent disablement and therefore he would be entitled to an interim award under Section 140 of the Act. The Tribunal rejected the application, holding that fracture/extraction of tooth would not be a permanent disablement under Section 142.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that the Tribunal was unjustified in rejecting the application under Section 140. The court found that the destruction or permanent impairment of the powers of any member or joint would certainly provide a ground for making an award under Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act irrespective of the percentage of loss or the grievousness of the injury or the resultant effect.

Issues: Whether fracture/extraction of tooth would be a permanent disablement under Section 142 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

Ratio Decidendi: The court interpreted Section 142 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and held that the destruction or permanent impairment of the powers of any member or joint would certainly provide a ground for making an award under Section 140 of the Act irrespective of the percentage of loss or the grievousness of the injury or the resultant effect.

Final Decision: The court allowed the appeal and held that the respondents were jointly and severally liable to pay the amount to the claimant. The amount (Rs. 25,000.00) shall be deposited by the respondents within six weeks from today. The claimant shall also be entitled to 12% interest on the said amount from the date of filing of the main petition till the payments are made.

R. S. GARG, J.

( 1 ) THE Tribunal has rejected the appellant's application filed under Section 142 holding that fracture/extraction of tooth would not be a permanent disablement under Section 142 of Motor Vehicles Act, therefore the appellant would not be entitled to an interim award under Section 140 of the Act. Being dissatisfied by the said order, the appellant/claimant has filed this appeal.

( 2 ) SHRI Kanojiya, learned counsel for the appellant contends that the Tribunal was not justified in ignoring the provisions contained in Section 142 and was unjustified in rejecting the application. On the other hand Shri Jain and Shri Rao submit that extraction/destruction of the tooth would not be a permanent disability, therefore Section 140 would not be applicable at this stage. Counsel for the respondents also submit that for the purpose of Section 140 there must be a permanent disablement as defined under Section 142. According to them, nothing further can be added to Section 142.

( 3 ) SECTION 140 provides for liability to pay compensation in certain cases on the principle of no fault. Section 140 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 reads as under :-"liability to pay compensation in certain cases on the principle of no fault.- (1) Where death or permanent disablement of any person has resulted from an accident arising out of the use of a motor vehicle or motor vehicles, the owner of the vehicle shall, or, as the case may be, the owners of the vehicles shall, jointly and severally, be liable to pay compensation in respect of such death or disablement in accordance with the provisions of this Section. (2) The amount of compensation which shall be payable under sub-section (1) in respect of the death of any person shall be a fixed sum of twenty-five thousand rupees and the amount of compensation payable under that sub-section in respect of the permanent disablement of any person shall be a fixed sum of twelve thousand rupees. (3) In any claim for compensation under sub-section (1), the claimant shall not be required to plead and establish that the death or permanent disablement in respect of which the claim has been made was due to any wrongful act, neglect or default of the owner or owners of the vehicle or vehicles concerned or of any other person. (4) A claim for compensation under sub-section (1) shall not be defeated by reason of any wrongful act, neglect or default of the person in respect of whose death or permanent disablement the claim has been made nor shall the quantum of compensation recoverable in respect of such death or permanent disablement be reduced on the basis of the share of such person in the responsibility for such death or permanent disablement.

( 4 ) ACCORDING to sub-section (1) of Section 140 where death or permanent disablement of any person has resulted from an accident arising out of the use of a motor vehicle then the owner/owners of the vehicle shall be liable to pay compensation in respect of such death or disablement in accordance with the provisions of Section 140. The word 'death' has not been defined in this Act, therefore the ordinary dictionary meaning would be sufficient to mean that where the person has lost his life.

( 5 ) SECTION 142 refers to permanent disablement, it reads as under :-"permanent disablement.- For the purposes of this Chapter, permanent disablement of a person shall be deemed to have resulted from an accident of the nature referred to in sub-section (1) of Section 140 is such person has suffered by reason of the accident, any injury or injuries involving : (a) permanent privation of the sight of either eye or the hearing of either ear, or privation of any member or joint; or (b) destruction or permanent impairing of the powers of any members or joint; or (c) permanent disfiguration or the head of face.

( 6 ) ACCORDING to Section 142 permanent disablement shall be deemed to have resulted if such person has suffered any injury or injuries involving permanent privation of the sight










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top