SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(MP) 664

S.P.SRIVASTAVA
BANK OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
KALPTARU VANIKA, BHOPAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
J.D.Suryavanshi, R.D.Jain, S.DUBEY

S. P. SRIVASTAVA, J.

( 1 ) HEARD the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel representing the contesting respondents.

( 2 ) THE petitioner-Bank had issued a recovery-certificate contemplated under Section 3 of the Madhya Pradesh Lok Dhan (Shodhya Rashiyon Ki Vasuli) Adhiniyam, 1987, against (1) M/s. Kalptaru Vanika, a Partnership Firm as well as (2) Mrs. Praveen Malik, Partner, (3) Mrs. Reeni Malik, (4) Mrs. Sarita Tondon, and (4) Mr. Ramakant Ram, who were its partners, for the recovery of an amount of Rs. 22,80,797/- along with an interest calculated at the rate of 18. 25 per cent. In the aforesaid recovery-certificate it had also been indicated that Mr. Subhash Malik, the present respondent No. 6, was the guarantor for securing the payment due to the Bank. The aforesaid recovery certificate was issued on 8-10-1996.

( 3 ) PURSUANT to the recovery-certificate indicated hereinabove, proceedings for the recovery of the amount mentioned therein were initiated under the provisions of the Madhya Pradesh Lok Dhan (Shodhya Rashiyon Ki. Vasuli) Adhiniyam, 1987. The Scheme underlying the provision of the aforesaid Act clearly indicates the recovery-certificate has


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top