SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(MP) 644

A.K.MATHUR, DIPAK MISRA
VIPIN PARERA – Appellant
Versus
DAVID LAGHRAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.Bhoumik, L.P.Sanghi, N.S.KALE

DIPAK MISRA, J.

( 1 ) CORRECTNESS of the judgment rendered in the Misc. Appeal No. 146/94, preferred under S. 299 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), whereby the learned single Judge of this Court has affirmed the orders passed by the IVth Additional District Judge, Jabalpur in Misc. Judicial Case No. 70/87 and Misc. Judicial Case No. 86/87, is called in question in this Letters Patent Appeal.

( 2 ) THE respondents No. 1 and 2 filed an application under S. 276 of the Act for grant of probate in respect of the properties of one Mrs. Mavis Ada Lynch, on the ground that she had executed a Will on 18-6-1983 in their favour bequeathing of her movable and immovable properties. It was averred in the said application that the Will was written in her own hand and she had executed it. The present appellant, the caveator, did not file any formal objection to resist the application but filed an application forming the subject-matter of Misc. Judicial Case No. 86/86 for grant of probate on the basis of subsequent Will executed by Mrs. Lynch. In the said application the present appellant claimed that Mrs. Lynch had executed a Will dated 15-8-1987 in his fav














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top