SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(MP) 643

B.A.KHAN, SHAMBHOO SINGH
KIRTI – Appellant
Versus
RAJENDRA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
SANJAY SANYAL

( 1 ) THIS order shall govern the disposal of M. A. No. 260 of 1998, Kirti v. Rajendra and M. A. No. 261 of 1998, Tejubai v. Rajendra, as both appeals are directed against the judgment and award dated 20. 11. 1997 passed by motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, West nimad, Mandleshwar, in Claim Case No. 7 of 1996.

( 2 ) THE case of the claimants-appellants was that on 7. 6. 1995, they were travelling in jeep No. MP 10-9860 owned by the respondent No. 1 and insured with respondent No. 3. The respondent No. 2 drove it rashly and negligently. There was collision between this vehicle and a truck coming from the opposite direction at high speed, as a result of which Tejubai sustained injuries on her right hand while kirti got her right leg fractured. They were admitted in T. Choithram Hospital and tejubai's right hand and Kirti's right leg were amputated. Tejubai had filed Claim petition No. 9 of 1996 seeking compensation of Rs. 8,05,000. Kirti had claimed rs. 7,30,000 as compensation in Claim case No. 7 of 1996 against the respondents. The respondents resisted the claim and pleaded that the claim was not maintainable as the owner, driver and insurer of the truck were not made party. The tri








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top