SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(MP) 498

FAKHRUDDIN
VIVEK DWIVEDI – Appellant
Versus
PREM NARAIN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ARAVIND DUDAVAT, J.P.Gupta, M.C.GUPTA

S. P. SRIVASTAVA, J.

( 1 ) FEELING aggrieved by the judgment and order passed by the learned single Judge whereunder allowing the writ petition filed by the respondent No. 1, the order passed by the State Appellate Tribunal seeking setting aside the order of the Regional Transport Authority granting the stage carriage permit to the said respondent has been quashed, the objector/respondents in the writ petition have now come up in Letters Patent Appeal seeking redress praying for the setting aside of the impugned order passed by the learned single Judge.

( 2 ) WE have heard the learned counsel for the appellants as well as the learned counsel representing the contesting respondent, and have carefully perused the record.

( 3 ) THE facts in brief, shorn of details and necessary for the disposal of this appeal lie in a narrow compass. The respondent No. 1 had moved an application praying for the grant of a permit on 28-10-1996 for service of a stage carriage of two return trips daily on the route Ashoknagar to Kadwaya via Saraskhedi, Issagarh, Gahora and Manethi and for a single return trip daily between Ashoknagar to Isagarh via Saraskhedi.

( 4 ) THE Regional Transport Authority, Gwal

























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top