SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(MP) 426

A.S.TRIPATHI, S.P.SRIVASTAVA
VIRENDRA SINGH PAL – Appellant
Versus
KASHIBAI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.M.Naik, P.N.GUPTA

S. P. SRIVASTAVA, J.

( 1 ) FEELING aggrieved by the order dismissing his appeal directed against the rejection of the application filed by the appellant under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act for obtaining a Succession Certificate, he has now come up in this Letters Patent Appeal seeking redress praying for the reversal of the impugned order.

( 2 ) WE have heard the learned counsel for the appellant as well as the learned counsel repre-senting the contesting respondents and have also carefully perused the record.

( 3 ) THE facts in brief, shorn of details and necessary for disposal of this appeal lie in narrow compass. Narain Singh Pal, who was employed as a Chowkidar in a Government Office, died in harness on 13-6-1995. He had married Smt. Hirobai and had a son Virendra Singh Pal, Smt. Hirobai, however, died long back. On the death of Narain Singh Pal, Virendra Singh moved an application dated 1-7-1995 under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act praying that a Succession Certificate be issued in his favour in respect of the Provident fund, gratuity and insurance amount to which Narainsingh Pal was entitled. In the aforesaid application it was alleged that apart from Vir



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top