SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(MP) 987

A.K.MATHUR, DIPAK MISRA
BHAGWANI SAHU – Appellant
Versus
VIJAY KUMAR MOHANTY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
H.B.AGRAWAL

DIPAK MISRA, J.

( 1 ) THE moot question that arises for consideration in this appeal preferred under section 173 of the Motor vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') is whether grant of compensation in a sum of Rs. 75,000 to the agonised parents who have sustained the loss of their daughter whose life spark was extinguished being dashed against by the tempo owned by the appellant herein is justified or not. Mr. H. B. Agrawal, learned counsel for the appellant would like us to interfere with the award on a solitary ground that the deceased was a seventeen years old girl and would not have contributed to the parents for long, and hence the quantum determined by the Tribunal is not only excessive and illegal but also unpragmatic.

( 2 ) BEFORE we deal with the contention of Mr. Agrawal which reflects the gender discrimination without any other factual foundation, it is essential to narrate some essential facts that unfold the tragic end of the victim Mahamaya.

( 3 ) THE facts: In the afternoon of 7. 5. 93, mahamaya, a student of 12th standard who was engaged in private tuition was going to her pupils' house on her bicycle. Near Maroda Sector, Tempo bearing registratio











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top