R.P.GUPTA
K. K. PATNAYAK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M. P. – Respondent
( 1 ) THREE petitioners in this revision challenge the order dated 22-1-94 of II Addl. Sessions Judge, Sidhi in S. T. No. 26/92 whereby prayer of these petitioners to discharge was declined. These petitioners along with Shyamnarayan were tried for offences u/s. 306, 498-A, 201, IPC. Wife of Shyamnarayan Satyabhama received some burns on 20-7-90. She was brought to N. C. L. Hospital, Amroli where Dr. (Smt.) K. K. Patnayak was Dy. Supdt. She gave treatment to the patient and referred her to N. C. L. Hospital, Singroli the same day. She was taken to the Singroli hospital same day. At Singroli petitioners 2 and 3 Dr. Ashok Sharma and Dr. S. K. Mishra had treated her. She expired on 27-7-90. The incident occurred at 1-30 p. m. and the patient was referred to Singroli that very evening. On the death of the patient one of the doctors sent information to the police on the basis of which marg intimation was recorded and since the parents of the deceased complained of harassment cruelty to the deceased by the husband who is another accused in the case, it ultimately resulted in preparation of the charge-sheet for offences u/s. 306, 498-A, IPC. These petitioners were also sent
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.