SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(MP) 384

FAIZAN UDDIN
SHAMINA BEGUM – Appellant
Versus
RAJENDRA WAGHMARE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Purnima Nigam

FAIZAN UDDIN, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal has been preferred by the claimants against an order dated 10-3-1998, passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Gwalior (Third Additional District Judge, Gwalior (for short, the 'tribunal'), whereby the Tribunal has rejected their application under Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as the 'act' ).

( 2 ) THE facts are that Indu Khan was driver of vehicle No. CIH 7681. While he was driving the truck, it met with an accident in which Indu Khan died. The claimants who are the legal representatives of deceased Indu Khan made a claim for compensation under Section 166 of the Act. Along with this claim an application for compensation under Section 140 of the Act was also made before the Tribunal. While considering this application, the Tribunal has arrived at the findings that the deceased himself was driving the vehicle and it was due to his rash and negligent driving that the accident took place in which he died. On these findings, the Tribunal rejected the application under S. 140 of the Act.

( 3 ) SMT. Purnima Nigam, learned counsel for the appellants, contended that in this case the Tribunal has found that the





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top