SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(MP) 249

S.C.PANDEY
KALYAN SINGH – Appellant
Versus
SADARANI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
SANJAY KUMAR AGARWAL, V.S.CHAUDHARY

S. C. PANDEY, J.

( 1 ) THE appellants have filed this appeal against the award dated 6. 9. 1996, passed by IV Additional Motor accidents Claims Tribunal, Sagar, in M. V. Case No. 81 of 1991, awarding a claim of rs. 74,000 and interest thereon at the rate of 12 per cent per annum from the date of filing of claim application, in favour of the respondent-claimant Nos. 1, 2 and 3.

( 2 ) IN this appeal none appeared on behalf of the respondent Nos. 1 to 3. It is not necessary for them to be represented for the purpose of final disposal of this appeal as they are not affected by allowing this appeal, filed by the owner and driver of the vehicle involved, requiring this court to modify the impugned award saying that the respondent No. 4, United India Insurance Co. Ltd. too shall be jointly and severally liable to pay the amount of the impugned award.

( 3 ) I have heard learned counsel for the appellants as well as learned counsel for the respondent No. 4. The argument raised by the learned counsel for the appellants is that the Claims Tribunal has wrongly exonerated the respondent No. 4 from the liability to pay compensation jointly and severally along with the appellants on the ground th









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top