R.P.GUPTA
V. P. SHETH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M. P. – Respondent
( 1 ) IN this revision petition the preliminary question involved is whether in case of a public servant who has been compulsorily retired, when he is sought to be prosecuted for offence under Section 120-B, I. P. C. and u/ss. 13 (1) (d) (ii) r/w. 13 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, a sanction as precondition for his prosecution u/s. 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 or Section 197, Cr. P. C. , is essential. The petitioner in this case was a member of Indian Administrative Service. At the relevant time of offence he was employed as Managing Director of M. P. Leather Development Corporation. The period was the year 1988-89. The allegation is that during that period he committed criminal misconduct punishable under Sections 13 (1) (d) r/w. 13 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Section 13 (1) (d) of this Act declared the following conducts of the public servant as criminal misconducts :"13. Criminal misconduct by a public servant.- (1) A public servant is said to commit the offence or criminal misconduct.- (A) to (c ). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (D) if he,- (I) by corrupt or illegal means, obtains for himself or for
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.