SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(MP) 476

C.K.PRASAD
VINEET FOOD PRODUCTS PVT. LIMITED, JABALPUR – Appellant
Versus
BANK OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
RAVINDRA SHRIVASTAVA, S.K.MUKHERJEE

C. K. PRASAD, J.

( 1 ) BEREFT of unnecessary details, facts which are necessary for the decision of the present writ petition are that respondent No. 1 Bank of India (hereinafter referred to as the Bank) filed Civil Suit No. 6-A/95 in the Court of District Judge, Jabalpur, for recovery of an amount of Rs. 35,05,522/ -. After the constitution of the Debt Recovery Tribunal, suit filed by the respondent Bank was transferred to the former as provided under Section 31 of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993. By order dated 17-5-1999 the Debt Recovery Tribunal allowed the application filed by the Bank and held that the Bank is entitled to recover its dues from the petitioner along with interest. Aggrieved by the same, one of the petitioners namely petitioner No. 2 Sanjiv Kumar Jain preferred appeal before the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, impleading other petitioners as respondents in the appeal. Appeal preferred by petitioner No. 2 was registered as Appeal No. 54/99. Before the Debts Recovery Tribunal he filed application for waiver of the deposit as required under Section 21 of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 199
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top