SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(MP) 426

V.K.AGRAWAL
MALLOO GIR GOSWAMI – Appellant
Versus
CHATURBHUJ RAI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ANIL DWIVEDI, PRAFULLA BHARAT, SANJAY KUMAR AGARWAL

V. K. AGRAWAL, J.

( 1 ) HEARD finally with the consent of the parties. The appellant/claimant, father of the deceased, filed an application under section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act' for short)for grant of compensation on account of accidental death of his son, Shiv Kumar with truck bearing registration No. CPT 2561. The said truck was owned by respondent

( 2 ) AND its driver was respondent No. 1. Respondent No. 3 admittedly insured the said vehicle. The appellant/ claimant also filed an application under section 140 of the Act for grant of interim award on the principle of no fault liability. The averments were that one of the tyres of the truck had punctured; the truck was standing on the side of the road. Deceased Shiv Kumar came on a motor cycle, dashed against the truck and sustained fatal injuries. It also appears that respondent no. 1 was prosecuted regarding the said incident and he pleaded guilty and was accordingly punished.

( 3 ) THE learned Tribunal held that since the truck was stationary and it was not being driven rashly or negligently, grant of interim compensation would not be proper.

( 4 ) LEARNED counsel for the claiman




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top