SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(MP) 384

C.K.PRASAD
SURYAKANT CHADRAKAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Alok Aradhe, G.S.AHLUVALIA, K.C.Ghildiyal, R.S.JHA, Sharad Verma

C. K. PRASAD, J.

( 1 ) SURYAKANT Chandrakar (petitioner in W. P. No. 3715/1998), Mukund Marotirao Khanti (petitioner in W. P. No. 2704/98) as also Smt. Gyani Lunia, (respondent No. 3 in both the writ petitions), Manju Kiran Kalia (respondent No. 4 in W. P. No. 3715/98 and respondent No. 5 in W. P. No. 2704/98), Gopinath Sao (respondent No. 5 in W. P. No. 3715/98 and respondent No. 4 in W. P. 2704/98), hereinafter referred to as the 'appointees', besides 9 other persons were candidates for appointment as Notaries in Mahasamund Tahsil of the District of Raipur. Petitioners being aggrieved by their non-appointments and appointments of respondents No. 3 to 5 aforesaid, have filed the present writ petitions and pray for issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction commanding respondents No. 1 and 2 to appoint them as notaries for Mahasamund Tahsil for a period of 5 years with effect from 30th of July 1998 and to quash the appointments of respondents No. 3 to 5 as Notaries.

( 2 ) BRIEFLY stated facts giving rise to the present writ petition are that respondent No. 2, the District and Sessions Judge, Raipur i. e. , the competent authority, issued notice dated 24th of Sept. 1997 invi












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top