SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(MP) 246

DIPAK MISRA
BAJRANGLAL – Appellant
Versus
UMESH KUMAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
HEMAND NAMDEO, SANJAY KUMAR AGARWAL

DEEPAK MISRA, J.

( 1 ) CHALLENGE is to the order dated 31-10-1994 passed by the learned 1st Additional District Judge, Bilaspur rejecting the application preferred under Order 32 Rule 12 of the Code of Civil Procedure (in short 'the Code') by the defendant No. 1.

( 2 ) THE facts as have been uncurtained are that the non-applicant No. 1 as plaintiff filed a civil suit No. 9-A/86 in the Court of First Additional District Judge, Bilaspur being represented by his maternal uncle, Harishankar Joshi. The suit was for declaration of right, title interest and permanent injunction. After the plaintiff became major the defendant No. 1 filed an application under Order 32 Rule 12 of 'the Code' requiring the plaintiff to make an election either to proceed with the suit or abandon the same. The said application was resisted by the guardian and the learned trial Judge rejected the application on the ground that it was open to the plaintiff to make a choice.

( 3 ) MR. Sanjay Agrawal, learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn the attention of this Court to Order 32 Rule 12 of the CPC to highlight that when a minor plaintiff becomes major he has to make an election whether to contest the suit or ab







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top