SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(MP) 746

A.K.MISHRA, BHAWANI SINGH
SAVITRI DEVI – Appellant
Versus
NARESH KUMAR HARIKRISHNA MADHWANI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
N.S.Ruprah, SANJAY KUMAR AGARWAL

BHAWANI SINGH, C. J.

( 1 ) THIS judgment will dispose of M. A. No. 531 of 1998 (Savitri Devi v. Naresh Kumar Harikrishna madhwani) and M. A. No. 830 of 1998 (Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Savitri devi) and the cross-objections filed by the insurance company in M. A. No. 531 of 1998.

( 2 ) THESE appeals are directed against the award dated 20. 2. 1998 of the Motor accidents Claims Tribunal, Bilaspur in claim Case No. 1 of 1995.

( 3 ) THE claimants are legal representatives of Radheshyam Sahu (deceased) who was travelling in Tempo No. MIL 6144 to village Kherkhena driven by one Santram sahu. Tempo was hit by Matador No. MOT 9039 which came from opposite direction. Deceased died due to the injuries sustained by him in the accident. Matador vehicle was driven by Mohd. Yunus, owned by naresh Kumar Harikrishna Madhwani and lajwanti Devi and insured with Oriental insurance Co. Ltd. It was a commercial vehicle. Insurance company has taken the defence that Mohd. Yunus did not possess valid and effective driving licence to drive matador.

( 4 ) THE Tribunal found that Radheshyam died in the accident on account of rash and negligent driving of Matador by Mohd. Yunus. His income was Rs. 800 pe







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top