SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(MP) 719

High Court Of Madhya Pradesh
S. C. PANDEY
RAHUL MISHRA - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M.P. - Respondents
CRI. R. 1099 Of 2000
Decided On : 08/11/2000

Advocates Appeared:
Sunil Sinha

The primary consideration for granting bail to a juvenile delinquent should be whether the release would defeat the ends of justice, and the Act provides special protection and favorable consideration for granting bail to juvenile delinquents based on their age.

Headnote:

Juvenile Justice Act - Bail for Juvenile Delinquent - The court interpreted Section 18 of the Juvenile Justice Act and held that the considerations for granting bail to a juvenile delinquent are entirely different from those for adults. The court emphasized that the primary consideration should be whether the release of the juvenile delinquent would defeat the ends of justice, rather than prima facie guilt. The court set aside the lower court's order and directed the release of the juvenile on bail.

Fact of the Case:

The applicant, a juvenile, was charged with multiple offenses and was denied anticipatory bail by the Court. He was sent to a juvenile home by the Juvenile Court, and this decision was confirmed by the Sessions Judge. The applicant sought bail under Section 38 of the Juvenile Justice Act, arguing that the considerations for granting bail to a juvenile delinquent are different from those for adults.

Finding of the Court:

The Court analyzed the interpretation of Section 18 of the Juvenile Justice Act and concluded that the primary consideration for granting bail to a juvenile delinquent should be whether the release would defeat the ends of justice. The Court held that the lower court's refusal of bail based on prima facie guilt was not in line with the legislative intention, and directed the release of the applicant on bail.

Issues: The issues involved the interpretation of Section 18 of the Juvenile Justice Act regarding the grant of bail to juvenile delinquents and the proper considerations for such decisions.

Ratio Decidendi: The primary consideration for granting bail to a juvenile delinquent should be whether the release would defeat the ends of justice, rather than prima facie guilt. The court emphasized that the Act provides special protection and favorable consideration for granting bail to juvenile delinquents based on their age.

Final Decision: The Court set aside the lower court's order and directed the release of the applicant on bail, subject to reasonable conditions imposed by the Juvenile Court.

S. C. PANDEY, J.

( 1 ) THIS is criminal revision under Section 38 of the Juvenile Justice Act, 1986 (henceforth 'the Act' ). The applicant Rahul Mishra is being charged under Sections 147, 294, 452, 323, 506 Part-II, 307 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code in Crime No. 8/2000, Police Station Basantpur, District Sarguja. It appears that there is no dispute between the State and the applicant regarding the age of the applicant. He is less than 16 years of age and, therefore, he is a juvenile and, consequently deemed to be a juvenile offender with the meaning of the Act.

( 2 ) THE applicant was not granted anticipatory bail by this Court. However, he was produced before the Juvenile Court presided over by two Judvenile Magistrates First Class at Ambikapur by order dated 21-6-2000. Both the Magistrates of the Juvenile Court have passed an order sending the applicant to juvenile home.

( 3 ) IN appeal under Section 37 of the Act, the learned Sessions Judge, by order dated 27-6-2000, has confirmed the order passed by the Juvenile Court.

( 4 ) IN this revision, under Section 38 of the Act, it has been urged by learned counsel for the applicant that once a person is held to be a juvenile delinquent, then Section 18 of the Act would govern the question of grant of bail and the custody of juvenile. It is argued that the bail to a juvenile can only be refused if there appears to be a reasonable ground for believing that his release is likely to bring him into association with any known criminals or expose him to moral danger or his release would defeat the ends of justice. It is argued that this consideration is notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The Court below has refused the bail to the applicant on the ground that the applicant was present at the spot when the crime was committed and prima facie he was liable to be tried for the offences for which he is charged.

( 5 ) IN the opinion of this Court, the considerations for grant of bail to a juvenile delinquent are entirely different. Firstly, the prosecution, opposing the bail to the applicant, must establish or there must be some material on record for believing that in case, the juvenile delinquent is released on bail, he is likely to come into association with a known criminal. Or in the alternative secondly, the aforesaid juvenile delinquent is likely to be exposed to moral danger. Or in the other alternative thirdly, his release would defeat the ends of justice. In the opinion of this Court, it is only third ground which appears to have prohibited the Court below because it held that it was not proper to release the applicant on bail on the ground that there was a prima faciecase against him. This interpretation of the Statute under Section 18 of the Act is not exactly in consonance with the intention of legislature. In the opinion of this Court, the words "notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973" would indicate that the considerations which are germane for granting or refusing bail to persons who are not juvenile delinquent shall not come into play for granting or refusing bail to them. Here the words "ends of justice" should be confined to those facts which show that the grant of bail itself is likely to result in injustice. For example, there is likelihood of the juvenile delinquent, to whom the bail is granted, interfering with the course of justice or is likely to abscond from the jurisdiction of the Court. The aforesaid categories are only by way of illustrative and exhaustive. The juvenile delinquent may appear to be guiltyprima faciebut he is especially protected by the Act and is favourably considered for grant of bail under Section 18 of the Act for the reason of his age.

( 6 ) ACCORDINGLY, this Court is of the view that the order passed by the Court below dated 27-6-2000 in Criminal Appeal No. 44/2000 and the order dated 21-6-2000 passed by the Juvenile Court, Ambikapur, District Sarguja in relation



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top