SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(MP) 791

High Court Of Madhya Pradesh
BHAWANI SINGH, A. K. MISHRA
KHUMAN SINGH - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH - Respondents
M. A. 1012 Of 1998
Decided On : 08/29/2000

Advocates Appeared:
N.Nagrath, S.L.Kochar

The court applied the provisions of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 and the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 to assess and modify the compensation for the claimants based on their injuries and disabilities.

Headnote:

Compensation - Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Motor Vehicles Act, 1988

Fact of the Case:

The claimants, who were laborers of the irrigation department, were injured in an accident while deployed with a dumper. They challenged the awarded compensation.

Finding of the Court:

The court determined the compensation for the claimants based on their monthly income, extent of injury, and disability percentage, modifying the original awards.

Issues: Assessment of compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 and the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

Ratio Decidendi: The court assessed the compensation in accordance with the provisions of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 and the principles of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, considering the claimants' monthly income, extent of injury, and disability percentage.

Final Decision: The court modified the original awards and ordered the payment of revised compensation amounts with interest, if not paid within two months.

BHAWANI SINGH, C. J.

( 1 ) THESE two cases are proposed to be decided by this order since they arise out of the same accident but different awards.

( 2 ) THE claimants were labourers of irrigation Department (respondent No. 1 ). On the date of accident, which took place on december 29, 1992, they were deployed with dumper No. CPZ 7867. The allegation is that the Dumper was b'eing driven rashly and negligently as a result of which it overturned, resulting in injuries to the occupants which included two claimants. Khuman Singh sustained fracture of left thigh. Khuman Singh was 25 years old at the time of the accident and disability is 50%. He has been awarded Rs. 38,500. 00 towards compensation with interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of application till realisation. Puranlal was 30 years old at the time of accident. He sustained fracture of thigh and bone injury in left foot. Disability is 45%. He has been awarded Rs. 56,000. 00 with interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of application till realisation. Both the claimants are not satisfied with the Award. Therefore, they have challenged the award through these appeals.

( 3 ) HEARD the learned counsel for the parties, perused the record of the case.

( 4 ) CONTENTION of Shri S. L. Kochar, learned counsel for the appellants is that the compensation has not been assessed properly. The determination of compensation has to be done in accordance with the provisions of workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 read with principles of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

( 5 ) WITH this background, we proceed to determine the compensation of the two claimants. Taking into consideration Rs. 900. 00 as monthly income of Khuman Singh and the extent of injury, we are of the opinion that compensation of Rs. 64,800. 00 should be paid to him in addition to Rs. 13,500. 00 for medical expenses and special diet making the total compensation to Rs. 78,300. 00 with interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of petition till realisation.

( 6 ) IN the case of Puranlal, taking into consideration disability of 45% 30 years age and monthly income of Rs. 500. 00, he should be entitled to compensation of Rs. 87,480. 00 in addition to Rs. 26,000.-; taking the total compensation to Rs. 1,13,480. 00 with interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of application till realisation. It is ordered that in case the compensation is not paid within two months from today, the compensation amount shall be paid with interest at the rate of 18% per annum.

( 7 ) IN both the appeals, awards are modified to the extent aforesaid. Parties to bear their own cost.


.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top