SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(MP) 478

V.D.GYANI
BANSILAL KALA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Jai Singh, S.L.GARG, S.S.Garg

V. D. GYANI, J, J.

( 1 ) BOTH these petitions relate to the same matter praying for cancellation of bail granted to the accused - non-applicants. Mr. Cr. C. 1442/90-a letter petition which Bansilal the complainant, has preferred before this Court while M. Cr. C. 1314/90 has been preferred through his counsel. Both these petitions are heard together and are being disposed of by a common order.

( 2 ) SHRI Jaisingh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri S. L. Garg with Shri S. S. Garg, learned counsels for the accused-respondents, are heard.

( 3 ) SHORT facts giving rise to these petitions may now be noted: Sangita, the daughter of the complainant-petitioner Bansilal, was married to Rajmal and Rajendra sb Prabhulal - non-applicant No. 2. This marriage was solemnised on 5th June, 90 at Bhasoda Mandi, District Mandsaur, Just within five days of the marriage, it is alleged that Sangita was so much tortured for dowry, that the on 10-6-1990, committed suicide by setting fire to herself. Her father, however, suspected that she was infact burnt to death. Sangita in her dying declaration had also made such a statement. It is a question relating to merits, which I do not, at this stage pr





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top