SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(MP) 429

R.D.SHUKLA
CHANDRANI BAI – Appellant
Versus
PRADEEP KUMAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.M.Sapre, N.K.PATEL

R. D. SHUKLA, J.

( 1 ) THIS is plaintiff's appeal against the judgment and decree dated 30-3-1984, passed by the District Judge, Seoni, in Civil Appeal No. 47-A of 1983 (arising out of the judgment and decree dated 3-10-1983, passed by the Civil Judge (Class-I), Seoni, in Civil Suit No. 3-A of 1981), whereby the plaintiff's suit for possession of a room of the house situated in Lakhnadon (District Seoni), has been dismissed.

( 2 ) BRIEF history of the case is that the plaintiff Smt. Chandranibai is the widow of one Hukumchand Jain, resident of Bazar Mohalla of Lakhnadon (District Seoni ). He died on 2-7-1979. Hukumchand owned and possessed huge moveable and immovable property. It was inherited by the plaintiff.

( 3 ) THE plaintiff's case is that the defendant Pradeep Kumar is known to her and he had been helping her. He made a request to give him the suit 'kotha' for opening a shop. The plaintiff permitted him to possess the 'kotha' of her house situated in Lakhnadon (District Seoni) and as shown in red colour in the map attached to the plaint. It is further alleged that the licence for occupation of 'kotha' was given to the defendant on the condition that he will vacate the same as





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top