SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(MP) 170

A.G.QURESHI
RAMPRASAD – Appellant
Versus
BHERULAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.V.TRIVEDI, R.C.Verma

A. G. QURESHI, J.

( 1 ) THIS miscellaneous appeal is directed against the order dated 11-880 passed by the fifth Addl. District Judge, Indore in Probate Case No. 32 of 1978.

( 2 ) THE facts leading to this appeal, in short, are that the appellant filed an application in the court of the Fifth Addl. District Judge, Indore for obtaining a probate of a Will alleged to have been executed by one Sahodra Bai. The application was resisted by the respondents on the ground that the Will is not genuine and a preliminary objection was also raised that the said Will, on which a probate is being sought, is not a Will because it does not fall within the definition of a 'will'. The lower Court raised the preliminary issue which was issue No. 5 to the effect that whether the disputed document falls within the definition of a 'will' and held that the document does not fall within the ambit of Will and hence the application seeking probate was dismissed. Hence this appeal.

( 3 ) THE learned counsel for the Appellant Shri Trivedi challenges the order of the lower court on the ground that the learned lower court has wrongly construed the document for holding that it is not a Will. The document could no






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top