SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(MP) 107

R.C.LAHOTI
BHARAT SINGH – Appellant
Versus
KUNWAR SINGH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.K.Shinde, R.S.Bajpai

R. C. LAHOTI, J.

( 1 ) THE defendant in a suit for declaration of title and issuance of a mandatory injunction who succeeded fully from the Trial Court, but lost partially in the plaintiff's appeal before the lower Appellate Court has come up in second appeal.

( 2 ) THE suit property consists of two parts. The plaint alleges that the property shown by letters (also in red colour) is plaintiffs' property, a part of their residential house, while the property shown by letters is a passage meant for approach to their house. In the month of August 1967, the defendant committed trespass over the passage and started raising construction over it. This led to initiation of proceedings before the Revenue authorities as also under the Criminal Law. However, the defendant did not desist. As the defendant denied the title and right of the plaintiffs, the plaintiffs sued for a declaration that the property was owned and possessed by them and also for a mandatory injunction against the defendant requiring removal of obstruction created by him in their way. The defendant denied in his written statement all the material averments made in the plaint and also took a plea that the suit was barred by t














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top