D.M.DHARMADHIKARI
BHANWARLAL – Appellant
Versus
BABULAL – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS appeal is by the auction purchasers, under S. 75 of the Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act' ). They are aggrieved by the action of the receiver - forfeiting their one-fourth deposit of the bid money for alleged breach of the terms of the auction in not depositing remaining sum of the bid within thirty days of the auction.
( 2 ) THE applicants first approached the Insolvency Court by an application under S. 68 of the Act which was allowed and the forfeiture was set aside with directions to the receiver to return the one-fourth deposit. The receiver preferred an appeal under S. 75 of the Act to the Court of the District Judge, Raipur, who by order dated 4-3-1982 allowed the appeal by setting aside the order of the Insolvency Court and upholding the action of the receiver of forfeiture of one-fourth deposit. The auction purchasers have, therefore, approached this Court in this appeal.
( 3 ) BY order passed on 25-3-1974, the partners of firm Jawerchand Thakarsi, Sadar Bazar, Raipur were adjudged insolvent under S. 9 of the Act with effect from 4-10-1972. That was the date of presentation of the petition in the Insolven
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.