SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(MP) 338

A.G.QURESHI
JASKUNVER – Appellant
Versus
KANCHANBAI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
HARBHAJANKA, KOCHATTA

A. G. QURESHI, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision petition is directed against the order dated 1-10-85 passed by the Second Addl. Judge to the Court of District Judge, Ratlam in Succession Case No. 4 of 1982.

( 2 ) THE facts leading to this revision petition, in short, are that the present applicant filed an application under S. 372 of the Indian Succession Act (hereinafter called the Act) for obtaining succession certificate regarding debts and securities forming part of the estate of the deceased Bhomsingh son of Ramlal Purhohit, aged about 62 years, who died on 10-7-1982 at Ratlam. The applicant claims to be real elder sister of the deceased who had no children or wife surviving him. According to the applicant the deceased had three accounts in the Banks specified in the petition, but she could not know the exact amount of the deposits in the Bank and she was also not in know of the different amounts advanced as loan to different persons. Therefore, she valued the debts and securities provisionally at Rs. 21,000/ -. According to the applicant, the non-applicants Nos. 1 and 2 were claiming as widow and daughter of deceased Bhomsingh respectively, therefore, a prayer for issuance of citation t











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top