SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(MP) 316

S.K.CHAWLA
SHRICHAND – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.S.Jha, RAKESH JAIN

S. K. CHAWLA, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision by the accused is directed against appellate judgment maintaining his conviction and sentence to a fine of Rs. 100/-, in default to simple imprisonment for one month, for the offence under S. 228, I. P. C.

( 2 ) THE appellant had filed a civil suit which was pending in the Court of Shri A. H. Shaikh Patel, Civil Judge, Khurai. When that suit was taken up on one of the dates of hearing i. e. on 15-2-1982, it was adjourned by the learned Civil Judge to next date in the absence of the applicant and his counsel. The applicant showed himself up shortly afterwards. He was agitated to find that the case had boon adjourned. He protested to the learned Civil Judge and instated that his case was taken up for hearing on that date itself. The learned Civil Judge felt that in the manner of making protest, and in refusing to leave the Court room even after direction by the Court, the applicant had caused interruption while the Judge was sitting in judicial proceeding. The learned Civil Judge then drew up summary proceedings as contemplated by S. 345, Criminal Procedure Code, and before the close of the day, the learned Civil Judge passed an order convicting t











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top