D. M. DHARMADHIKARI, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioners are all traders in timber. They were the highest successful bidders at the public auction held on 25-6-91 of lots of timber detailed in the impugned notice (Annexure-A ). The auction conditions are contained in the auction notice (Annexure-A ). The petitioners had made initial deposits of earnest money of 10% of reserve price as per auction condition No. 1. They signed the bid-sheet as successful bidders in terms of auction condition No. 9 and had deposited 25% of the bid amount, as required by condition No. 2 (a) (i ).

( 2 ) THE contention of the petitioners is that the sales of various timber lots, for which they had offered the highest bid, were complete. Hence the respondents who are the authorities in the Forest Department of the State of M. P. , had no right to cancel the auction sales vide impugned communication dated 25-7-91 (Annexure-C) of the respondent - D. F. O. directing refund of the prices paid by them and for taking steps to reauction the timber lots.

( 3 ) THE respondents supported their actions stating that the D. F. O. respondent No. 2, who was conducting the auction sale, had later on discovered that the petitioners

Click Here to Read the rest of this document